Your AI ships.
Your AI governance catches up — today.
ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act are mapped to the same SCF-aligned control library as your security program. Implement an AI governance control once and it answers questions across all three frameworks simultaneously.
AI governance is arriving faster than most programs can absorb it.
A dedicated AI framework is now table stakes in enterprise procurement — most teams aren't ready for it.
AI questionnaires are piling up
Enterprise buyers send 40-question AI risk assessments before procurement. Without an AI management system, your team guesses at answers and loses deals.
No documented AI inventory
You can't govern what you can't see. Most teams deploying AI have no documented inventory of what systems they operate, at what risk level, or who owns them.
Treated as a separate program
Teams waste months duplicating governance work — when ISO 42001 is designed to extend an existing ISMS, not replace it.
Built for teams shipping AI faster than their governance program.
AI governance as a first-class framework, not a bolt-on.
SecuryxAI launched with ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act mapped from the public standards — not a PDF library added on top of an existing product. The same control graph that runs your security program runs your AI governance program.
One AI governance control, three frameworks satisfied.
AI-specific controls (the AIG domain) cover risk management, transparency, bias, monitoring, and human oversight — mapped to all three frameworks from day one.
All three AI governance frameworks pre-mapped and included in every plan — not an add-on
AI-specific controls for risk management, transparency, bias, monitoring, and human oversight
Implement AIG-04 once — it satisfies ISO 42001 §6.1, NIST AI RMF GOVERN 1.1, and EU AI Act Art. 9 simultaneously
Questionnaire Engine is trained on AI-governance question patterns specifically
The same graph, a different framework domain.
AI governance controls live in the same Control Graph as your security program — and feed the same Questionnaire Engine when an AI RMF question comes in.
Purpose-built for the three frameworks that actually govern AI.
Not a subset of a broader list — these three are AI Governance's actual specialization.
What you actually walk away with.
A documented AI system inventory
What AI systems you operate, at what risk level, and who owns them.
An AI risk register
Risks tracked per system, with the controls addressing each one.
Framework readiness across all three
ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act coverage, calculated from the same control implementations.
Extends the ISMS you already have — doesn't replace it.
ISO 42001 is designed to sit alongside ISO 27001, not duplicate it — SecuryxAI treats it that way.
Existing security programs
AI governance controls live in the same graph as your existing ISO 27001 or SOC 2 controls, not a parallel system.
Existing governance teams
The same ownership and review workflow your team already uses for security controls applies here too.
Existing documentation
Model cards, risk assessments, and policies you've already written attach directly to AI governance controls.
What changes when AI governance isn't a separate program.
Map one control across three AI frameworks
Implement an AI governance control once; ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act all reflect it.
Complete AI questionnaires faster
AI-specific question patterns match to your AI governance controls automatically.
Improve AI audit readiness
A documented AI system inventory and risk register, ready before an assessor asks.
Reduce duplicate governance work
AI governance controls extend your existing ISMS instead of running alongside it separately.
A bolt-on AI module isn't AI governance.
A separate AI-governance tool recreates the exact problem this page argues against.
A standalone AI-risk point tool produces an AI answer disconnected from the rest of your security posture — a second governance program, not a solved one.
One control graph for security and AI
An AI system's risk register lives next to every other control — not in a second login with its own evidence library and its own questionnaire process.
One trust center, one story
A fragmented AI-governance tool means a second gap in your trust center and a second source auditors and prospects have to reconcile against the first.
No duplicate evidence for AI-specific asks
Evidence that already proves a security control often proves an AI-governance requirement too — a separate AI tool can't see it.
Watch one AI control satisfy three frameworks at once.
See how AIG-04 maps to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act simultaneously.
Full walkthrough coming soon
In the meantime, take the full interactive product tour — the real platform, not a recording.
Get AI governance-ready in days, not months.
Start your ISO 42001 gap analysis now. No consultants. No spreadsheets.